From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 18 09:09:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB3716A4CE for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:09:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhub2.midco.net (mailhub2.midco.net [24.220.0.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D5343D1D for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:09:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pmes@bis.midco.net) Received: (qmail 1228 invoked by uid 0); 18 Mar 2004 18:09:20 -0000 Received: from host-195-219-220-24.midco.net (HELO bis.midco.net) ([24.220.219.195]) (envelope-sender ) by lvs-pop.midco.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 18 Mar 2004 18:09:20 -0000 Message-ID: <4059D7BE.8070008@bis.midco.net> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:09:18 -0600 From: Peter Schultz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7a) Gecko/20040308 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: richardcoleman@mindspring.com References: <20040315134745.1eb201f4.manlix@demonized.net> <20040315125121.GC91150@abc.123.org> <20040315135725.3cc70f97.manlix@demonized.net> <20040317110938.GA86023@dragon.nuxi.com> <1079544327.63000.5.camel@scienide.energyhq.es.eu.org> <20040317174326.GA94853@dragon.nuxi.com> <405971FF.7050606@mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: <405971FF.7050606@mindspring.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pkg-based base system. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:09:20 -0000 Richard Coleman wrote: > The fact that certain bikesheds come up frequently is an indication that > many people are interested in it. > Well, both sides commit fallacies in their arguments, so FreeBSD just keeps hanging out in the field in between where the work gets done. The whole "create your own BSD" may seem like a cop out, but it is what works out for the best. It took years of going back and forth, but Matt Dillon finally did just that, and despite anyone's hard feelings, I'm sure it will only benefit our much beloved BSD. Maybe you can work with DragonFly on creating "The Ultimate Package Management System." I say three cheers for FreeBSD, and let this thread die! :-) Pete...