Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:43:28 -0400 From: Xin Li <delphij@delphij.net> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Xin LI <delphij@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r321227 - in head/net/iet: . files Message-ID: <51C15310.5040900@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: <20130619062325.GE61109@FreeBSD.org> References: <201306190224.r5J2OlM0017324@svn.freebsd.org> <20130619062325.GE61109@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 06/19/13 02:23, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 02:24:47AM +0000, Xin LI wrote: >> New Revision: 321227 URL: >> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/321227 >> >> Log: Unbreak on recent -CURRENT. >> >> @@ -1,13 +1,9 @@ [...] PORTNAME= iet PORTVERSION= 1.4.20.2 >> -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 > > I don't see why PORTREVISION was bumped for a build fix. Or the > package could be built, but was somehow bad? The port was broken for -CURRENT, but patch is applied against source regardless of FreeBSD version, which was not broken on other platforms (and the resulting binary may change due to this, depending on compiler used). I think PORTREVISION should always be bumped when a change could touch any files inside the binary package, no? Cheers, - -- Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> https://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJRwVMQAAoJEG80Jeu8UPuzd7IH/2d0D1hj5e0YY0IAB9bC2rtS sPKmujCeUVnLavKOvheR8yAEBAUj6etvXaj/VsnoARfB5iH62XJzPSjRy3TPm88t tzo0+jCdD+gUKbcrJA+SSrVQb4q5EHFJpbYqDsHI6by4JkP0GizFgbDADl3s5eM8 dLdPeIsdmMLQ7x8bHFBDRqBLYXpr/izL674EnC4hd7rTQRfgmNyxt6qq9toLhQTV TQ3bZ9ZIokeScu95hQ4QvkDslLO4P20BSw/KL/J/ltAhbypKegQNuhlOXPfNClTE RwYTCNCazKM30KMZFK5JEeSKM7ktxTO0ErgZNLii1BYULNIb+g832bENIbHTepc= =hX2n -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51C15310.5040900>