From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 11 22:37:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id BA9B616A4D0; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 22:37:05 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 22:37:05 +0000 From: Kris Kennaway To: Alexander@Leidinger.net Message-ID: <20041111223705.GL582@hub.freebsd.org> References: <1100122602.36242.25.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <1100176749.41935d6d12032@netchild.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1100176749.41935d6d12032@netchild.homeip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: Robert Watson cc: Joe Marcus Clarke cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6-CURRENT unbelievably slow? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 22:37:05 -0000 On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 01:39:09PM +0100, Alexander@Leidinger.net wrote: > Zitat von Joe Marcus Clarke : > > > I noticed the interrupt storm detection line in dmesg. In previous > > builds, this worked, but it doesn't seem to be taking effect anymore. > > AFAIK the interrupt storm detection was removed (at least partially). s/removed/fixed so it doesn't give so many false positives/ (at least partially) ;-) Talk to jhb.. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe