From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Feb 14 10:37:13 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id KAA05129 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 14 Feb 1995 10:37:13 -0800
Received: from feta.cisco.com (feta.cisco.com [171.69.1.158]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA05122 for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 1995 10:37:12 -0800
Received: from localhost.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by feta.cisco.com (8.6.8+c/CISCO.SERVER.1.1) with SMTP id KAA26294; Tue, 14 Feb 1995 10:35:45 -0800
Message-Id: <199502141835.KAA26294@feta.cisco.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: feta.cisco.com: Host localhost.cisco.com didn't use HELO protocol
To: osyjm@schizo.coe.montana.edu (Jaye Mathisen)
Cc: hasty@netcom.com, Jim Lowe <james@miller.cs.uwm.edu>,
        tinguely@plains.nodak.edu, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: GUS sound driver with vat support 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 14 Feb 1995 11:17:33 MST."
             <9502141817.AA03462@schizo.coe.montana.edu> 
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 1995 10:35:43 -0800
From: Paul Traina <pst@cisco.com>
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

"Control Queen" :-)

  From: osyjm@schizo.coe.montana.edu (Jaye Mathisen)
  Subject: Re: GUS sound driver with vat support 
  >>>>> "hasty" == hasty  <hasty@netcom.com> writes:
  
      hasty> Given Van Jacobson reluctance to release the source, I
  
  
  You know, I've read this several places.  What's the deal with this
  guy?  why the apparent reluctance to release source?  Paranoia?  Poor
  coding style?  Just the way he likes to do it?
  
  Seems like he puts out some cool stuff, but getting source is like
  pulling teeth.