Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 00:06:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek <hoek@hwcn.org> To: "Todd \"Taco\" Hansen" <taco@mad.scientist.com> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fnord0: disabled, not probed. Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.971013000318.5448C-100000@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca> In-Reply-To: <344189DD.3B54AFBF@mad.scientist.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 12 Oct 1997, Todd "Taco" Hansen wrote: > device was detected. If it says disabled, not probed, then you know > quick and easy what is up. The whole reason for showing all of the boot If it _doesn't_ say "detected, configured as blah_blah" you know quick and easy what is up. It it doesn't say "disabled, not probed", that could just as easily mean "not compiled into the kernel" as "detected and working correctly". > useful. If windows 95 freezes up on boot, you don't always know exactly > where it froze. As with FreeBSd you can usually tell what device it was > working on (if you know the boot order). I don't know, I find it a great FreeBSD is never going to freeze on a "disabled, not probed" device unless things are really really screwed up. -- Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never! tIM...HOEk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.3.96.971013000318.5448C-100000>