Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:38:49 +0100 From: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com> To: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Improving old-fashioned UFS2 performance with lots of inodes... Message-ID: <CAFHbX1LfFhrQZ=AyOmBaHi1hhBQkcNUB7=BA3TrGjQGSDmuB8Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CADLo838uyJYK9_HpWFm_5vuXaihm5fca%2Bxvay73EeYen%2Buw2Ng@mail.gmail.com> References: <1309217450.43651.YahooMailRC@web120014.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20110628010822.GA41399@icarus.home.lan> <CADLo838uyJYK9_HpWFm_5vuXaihm5fca%2Bxvay73EeYen%2Buw2Ng@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 28 June 2011 02:08, Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> wrote: >> >> On what exact OS version? =C2=A0Please don't say "8.2", need to know >> 8.2-RELEASE, -STABLE, or what. =C2=A0You said "8.x" above, which is too >> vague. =C2=A0If 8.2-STABLE you should not be tuning vm.kmem_size_max at = all, >> and you probably don't need to tune vm.kmem_size either. > > We don't do 8.2-STABLE, it's 8-STABLE.... Are you referring to the > difference between RELENG_8_2 and RELENG_8_2_0_RELEASE? > > Chris I've heard this mantra repeated before on list. If this is in fact true, then something needs to change so that uname -r agrees: > $ svn info | grep URL ; uname -r URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8 8.2-STABLE As far as the OS is concerned, 8.2-STABLE is RELENG_8 sometime between when RELENG_8_2 was branched and when RELENG_8_3 will be branched, and is an entirely legit description. IMO, just because it does not correspond to a specific branch or tag does not leave it without meaning. Cheers Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFHbX1LfFhrQZ=AyOmBaHi1hhBQkcNUB7=BA3TrGjQGSDmuB8Q>