From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Jun  2 02:39:05 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA09662
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 02:39:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from panda.hilink.com.au (panda.hilink.com.au [203.8.15.25])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA09657
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 02:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from danny@localhost)
	by panda.hilink.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA03947;
	Mon, 2 Jun 1997 19:38:49 +1000 (EST)
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 19:38:47 +1000 (EST)
From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au>
To: Harlan Stenn <Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Improvements to rc.firewall? 
In-Reply-To: <5827.865240396@mumps.pfcs.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970602193802.3844A-100000@panda.hilink.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk




On Mon, 2 Jun 1997, Harlan Stenn wrote:

> I "sort of" tested them, and they worked for me.
> 
> I checked this out by doing a tcpdump of my ppp link, and looked at all
> of the DNS traffic.  Responses to my queries came in to *my* port 53.

Are you running your own named locally?  That would be why.
 

/*  Daniel O'Callaghan                                                     */
/*  HiLink Internet <http://www.hilink.com.au/>       danny@hilink.com.au  */
/*  FreeBSD - works hard, plays hard...                 danny@freebsd.org  */