From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 11 02:27:42 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4432674B;
 Tue, 11 Jun 2013 02:27:42 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22d.google.com (mail-pa0-x22d.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22d])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138E41459;
 Tue, 11 Jun 2013 02:27:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id bi5so4997414pad.18
 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 19:27:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
 bh=YzWsOcwQyVgR4UCLPnhWmNsc07ApTehMnBRLjwgvgpQ=;
 b=xGkewv/11Go2Bq5r8nhuwJwrgGcTi9sHGOI9vYmtQHUQqZrPSZir8iB/wHzSreKavn
 U77EALld14/Ew7zKvAg5PTR8wnTEZO1gBl2gEc/zrgG5eORYTjzDmyLwGehhjgY7hDGw
 zCynOivJ+k60YEqyYkQn9WlPMoUbYw/fowgoWCXIn1lKoLdjMMV5vutccvS5oBhSNxnw
 BpwQ9BDXwTqwi8RGKEIleSSUgQr15/px5HPoVy/92m3jkOqD++TGJQrlOSluD94yqGXs
 f0KrHFskRaJmVISTOoxEmjBh5LzhKTPyevbOs7CjLBPur0BxhWwsNhujp6n9bzEPsApI
 TbHg==
X-Received: by 10.66.145.2 with SMTP id sq2mr16344004pab.2.1370917661909;
 Mon, 10 Jun 2013 19:27:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pyunyh@gmail.com (lpe4.p59-icn.cdngp.net. [114.111.62.249])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l4sm12504290pbo.6.2013.06.10.19.27.38
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Mon, 10 Jun 2013 19:27:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pyunyh@gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
 Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:27:34 +0900
From: YongHyeon PYUN <pyunyh@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:27:34 +0900
To: "Mr. Clif" <clif@eugeneweb.com>
Subject: Re: misc/179033: [dc] dc ethernet driver seems to have issues with
 some multiport card and mother board combinations
Message-ID: <20130611022734.GB1519@michelle.cdnetworks.com>
References: <201305300113.r4U1DRGp089692@freefall.freebsd.org>
 <51A6CE52.20501@eugeneweb.com>
 <20130530051214.GA1530@michelle.cdnetworks.com>
 <201305300929.31872.jhb@freebsd.org> <51B62547.5000207@eugeneweb.com>
 <20130611002848.GA1519@michelle.cdnetworks.com>
 <51B67CCA.2010507@eugeneweb.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51B67CCA.2010507@eugeneweb.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>,
 yongari@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 02:27:42 -0000

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 06:26:34PM -0700, Mr. Clif wrote:
> Is there any down side to using that dc fix in pfsense for now?

If dc(4) works as expected there is no reason not to use memory
BARs. Generally using memory BARs is more efficient. Many old PCI
controllers used to have bugs with memory BARs so driver used safer
I/O port BARs.

> 
> Yes, I would like to have time to submit the cas bug as well. Maybe in 
> the next week but probably by august I hope. ;-)
> 

Ok.

>     Thanks for your help,
>     Clif