From owner-freebsd-fs Tue Nov 24 04:28:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA15182 for freebsd-fs-outgoing; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 04:28:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sv01.cet.co.jp (sv01.cet.co.jp [210.171.56.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA15177 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 04:28:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michaelh@cet.co.jp) Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by sv01.cet.co.jp (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA17715; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 12:28:21 GMT (envelope-from michaelh@cet.co.jp) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 21:28:21 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock To: Artem Tepponen cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: unionfs broken? In-Reply-To: <36599C38.1CFBAE39@onego.ru> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Yes, it's broken. One approach to fixing it is in John Heidemann's object cache manager paper. Regards, Mike Hancock On Mon, 23 Nov 1998, Artem Tepponen wrote: > Hi, all! > > I have some questions regarding unionfs and mount -o union. > Are they broken? Tried to use them both and got kernel panic > messages. Is there anybody who's going to fix this? > If no, then can somebody give hints about where to start from? > > With best regards, Artem > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message