From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 14 14:11:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F162016A4CE; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:11:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC5043D5C; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:11:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (64-144-75-99.client.dsl.net [64.144.75.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9EEBpex072486 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:11:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:12:33 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: Denis Peplin Message-ID: <20041014101233.399d4b40@localhost> In-Reply-To: <416E8491.8080500@FreeBSD.org> References: <416E4DFD.3040203@FreeBSD.org> <20041014102459.GD799@zaphod.nitro.dk> <20041014092213.22d6914d@localhost> <416E8491.8080500@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12b (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org cc: "Simon L. Nielsen" Subject: Re: TCP Wrappers section (handbook/security): services is not daemons X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:11:54 -0000 On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:52:17 +0400 Denis Peplin wrote: > Hello! > > Yes, i see now that using word "daemon" for services is > tradition here :) > > It will not be a big problem, if we will add short > description for this "term" (explain tradition) in > beginning of the section. We can do that, but I do see one slight problem: Should you write a patch or should I? I'm kind of in the middle of a move and a new job so my FreeBSD time is pretty short. :) -- Tom Rhodes