Date: Tue, 18 Mar 1997 16:10:15 -0400 (AST) From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: 2.2-RELEASE panics: a theory Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970318160459.215V-100000@thelab.hub.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi... Because of all the recent problems with 2.2-RELEASE's kernel, I decided to plug back in one of my older kernels (from Feb 7th) to see if I had the same problems...so far so good. To test it, I decided to perform the same routine that I was doing that seemed to provoke the previous reboots: cd /usr/src; make cleandir With the Feb 7th kernel, I eventually get: ===> games/caesar rm -f a.out Errs errs mklog caesar caesar.o caesar.6.gz rm -f .depend tags ===> games/canfield ===> games/canfield/canfield fatal process exception: page fault, fault VA = 0x3f689 Segmentation fault - core dumped *** Error code 139 Now, granted, the above is most likely a memory problem, but, personally, I think a SegFault/core dump is better then a system crash. I'm performed the make cleandir twice so far, and they both died with the above error in /usr/src/games... Did something change that makes a reboot/crash of the system preferable to just SegFaulting, which seems to be what is happening with the 2.2-RELEASE kernel? I think that the SegFault is a much more friendly (kind?) way of handling it...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.970318160459.215V-100000>