From owner-freebsd-fs Wed Jun 12 13:34:18 1996 Return-Path: owner-fs Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA00628 for fs-outgoing; Wed, 12 Jun 1996 13:34:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA00595; Wed, 12 Jun 1996 13:34:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id NAA06704; Wed, 12 Jun 1996 13:33:29 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199606122033.NAA06704@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Breaking ffs - speed enhancement? To: fs@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Wed, 12 Jun 1996 13:33:29 -0700 (MST) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199606120333.UAA04275@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami" at Jun 11, 96 08:33:05 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-fs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Speaking of filesystems, does anyone know about works done on very > large (disk) filesystems? By "large", I'm talking in the range of > 100GB - 5TB. > > I know that FFS will have some problems once we go over about 200GB > (multi-hour fsck being one). But all we can find are studies on > tape-based systems (how to migrate stuff to/from disk, etc.)... Contact Matt Day about soft updates, which are running under Windows 95 in the cubilcle next to mine (mday@elbereth.org). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.