Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:06:44 +0300 From: "V.Chukharev" <chukharev@mail.ru> To: "V.Chukharev" <chukharev@mail.ru>, "Kris Kennaway" <kris@freebsd.org> Cc: Dirk Meyer <dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mk/bsd.openssl.mk optimization Message-ID: <op.ue3qhisl0g54sc@localhost> In-Reply-To: <op.ue17xeex0g54sc@localhost> References: <op.ueqfl1xy0g54sc@localhost> <08GlBzRclM@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> <op.ueumske80g54sc@localhost> <op.ueuwd8rs0g54sc@localhost> <488A0B2E.9070403@FreeBSD.org> <op.ue17xeex0g54sc@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:28:26 +0300, V.Chukharev <chukharev@mail.ru> wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:19:42 +0300, Kris Kennaway <kris@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> You don't want to .include the file, just use the same make -f trick >> that I used for e.g. the python and java variable caching. > > Ah, thanks, I think I got it now. Please, review. > [patch deleted] > > I also tried to make only one sweep over /var/db/pkg, but with uncommented > 'OPENSSL_INSTALLED+=' line (and corresponding '.if !defined' in bsd.openssl.mk) > INDEX-7 was different. I could not trace down the reason. I have found why there is a difference in INDEX-7 generated with and without caching. Without cache security/p5-openxpki* (6 connected ports) are indexed as depending on both openssl-0.9.8h_1 and openssl-beta-0.9.8h_1 (beta is not actually installed), while with cache the second dependence is lost. This is due to WITH_OPENSSL_BETA defined in security/p5-openxpki/Makefile (master for other slave ports). So, Dirk, you are right, cashing breaks current behavior. But now I wonder if the current behavior is correct and if security/p5-openxpki is correct. IMHO at least one of the two dependences is in err. > Best regards, > Vladimir > >> Kris >> > -- V. Chukharev
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.ue3qhisl0g54sc>