From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 22 09:12:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554C716A4B3 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 09:12:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.liwing.de (mail.liwing.de [213.70.188.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA23943FDD for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 09:12:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rehsack@liwing.de) Received: (qmail 29537 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2003 16:12:50 -0000 Received: from stingray.liwing.de (HELO liwing.de) ([213.70.188.164]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.liwing.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 22 Oct 2003 16:12:50 -0000 Message-ID: <3F96AC82.3090408@liwing.de> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:12:50 +0000 From: Jens Rehsack User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031022 X-Accept-Language: de-de, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." References: <20031022154447.33556.qmail@web40710.mail.yahoo.com> <3F96A869.2060003@daleco.biz> In-Reply-To: <3F96A869.2060003@daleco.biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: rogue_spider@yahoo.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cleaning X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:12:57 -0000 Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote: > Rogue Spider wrote: > >> is there a freebsd equivalent to scandisk and >> diskdefrag so that i can clean the drive it says on >> start up that the dir are fragmented but after that i >> am unsertain. > > If there is "fragmentation", it is cleaned up > in the boot process (for 4.x) or done in > the background after booting (on 5.x). Did it changed? My last information is, *bsd checks the disks at boot if they were not cleanly unmounted. Otherwise there will nothing happens in this direction. > Note that "fragmentation" on a ufs volume > is different from what you're used to > on DOS/FAT filesystems. Yes, fragments are parts of a block of a filesystem, where several small files or tails of files are stored together to avoid waste of space by using an entire block for a small piece of data. > As long as the box is running, you have no > worries. If there's ever a significant problem, you'll > be told to boot single-user and fix it yourself > using 'fsck'. Or you didn't notice. Usually next boot will show you. If a hardware failure occur, you may never notice except you check your entire disk(s) and prove all sectors on the disk. Jens