From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 19 15:09:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54D31065679 for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:09:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnewman@networktest.com) Received: from mail.networktest.com (mail.networktest.com [216.240.60.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B218FC17 for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:09:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnewman@networktest.com) Received: by mail.networktest.com (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 7E94B78C7E; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:09:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mail.networktest.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received: from levi.local (cpe-76-83-4-217.socal.res.rr.com [76.83.4.217]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 683B678C7B for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:09:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4882038F.6060805@networktest.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:09:03 -0700 From: David Newman Organization: Network Test Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080714233542.GA59789@root.ucsc.edu> <487BE866.2000309@gmail.com> <488188C2.5090705@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <488188C2.5090705@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: freebsd-update says -p3, but i've got -p2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:09:06 -0000 >> Mark Boolootian wrote: >>> which leads me to conclude I've got -p3, including the BIND update. >>> However 'uname -a' says something else: >>> >>> FreeBSD mumble.ucsc.edu 7.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p2 #0: Wed >>> Jun 18 07:33:20 UTC 2008 >>> root@i386-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 >>> >>> And although /usr/sbin/named has been updated, it appears not to have >>> been upgraded: >>> >>> $ /usr/sbin/named -v >>> BIND 9.4.2 >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> >> >> You've got p3, don't worry. There was no kernel update in p3, hence >> you got the p2 GENERIC kernel. If you want uname to actually show p3, >> you will have to recompile your kernel Shouldn't freebsd-update do this, not only for the kernel and named and whatever else it updates? I'm relatively new to freebsd-update, and while I appreciate its speed advantange over make buildworld/buildkernel, it's confusing when it applies updates but does not display correct version numbers. dn