From owner-freebsd-mobile Wed Nov 29 11:17:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63CF337B400 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 11:17:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eATJHHQ67635; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 12:17:18 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id MAA21668; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 12:17:16 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200011291917.MAA21668@harmony.village.org> To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Subject: Re: Here is what IBM thinks about using FreeBSD on their newer Thinkpads Cc: Ken Key , freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 29 Nov 2000 10:35:08 MST." <14885.15948.729037.110372@nomad.yogotech.com> References: <14885.15948.729037.110372@nomad.yogotech.com> <200011290551.eAT5pJF28047@mass.osd.bsdi.com> <200011291710.JAA88193@sodium.cips.nokia.com> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 12:17:16 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <14885.15948.729037.110372@nomad.yogotech.com> Nate Williams writes: : Didn't Robert shrink it back to 1 sector after 4.1 was released? It : would be interesting to know if the 'smaller' bootblock worked as well. Yes, he did. : (The box we're using is an A20, so it may be different from the A21 : problem..) Could be. FreeBSD has only been using the 165 partition type for about 9 years now. Maybe that's why they were confused. Also, does anybody know if dangerously dedicated works :-) Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message