Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      	Mon, 14 Aug 1995 15:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Tom Samplonius <tom@uniserve.com>
To:        Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>
Cc:        Garrett Wollman <wollman@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ioctl(SIOCAIFADDR): File exists
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.91.950814153438.16944K-100000@haven.uniserve.com>
In-Reply-To: <199508141656.SAA13030@uriah.heep.sax.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Mon, 14 Aug 1995, J Wunsch wrote:

> > Absolutely.  RFC 1323 and RFC 1644 are completely transparent to any
> > correctly-operating TCP implementation that doesn't support them.
> > (Hell, they even work against SunOS and Ultrix!)
> > 
> > > Seems that it didn't work. :-(
> > 
> > It seems highly unlikely that this is the cause.
> 
> Latest news is that it's a problem of the header compression.

  Header compression?  Doesn't that mean that it is SLIP or PPP problem 
then and not a TCP problem at all?

Tom



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.950814153438.16944K-100000>