From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 18 15:11:46 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 31F5216A4CE; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:11:46 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from itchy.rabson.org (mailgate.nlsystems.com [80.177.232.242])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8419443D66; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:11:45 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com)
Received: from ns0.nlsystems.com (ns0.nlsystems.com [80.177.232.243])
	by itchy.rabson.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7IFBUFd002747;
	Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:11:30 +0100 (BST)
	(envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com)
From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, drhodus@machdep.com
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:11:44 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <200408160104.03708.chris@behanna.org>
	<4123603F.2050201@cronyx.ru> <fe77c96b04081807281c76200@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <fe77c96b04081807281c76200@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200408181611.45299.dfr@nlsystems.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on itchy.rabson.org
X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.75.1, clamav-milter version 0.75c
	on itchy.rabson.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
cc: chris@behanna.org
cc: current@freebsd.org
cc: Roman Kurakin <rik@cronyx.ru>
Subject: Re: Public Access to Perforce?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:11:46 -0000

On Wednesday 18 August 2004 15:28, David Rhodus wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 17:57:19 +0400, Roman Kurakin <rik@cronyx.ru> 
wrote:
> > I fully agree with you. But this not affect "open source"ness.
> > I'd rather call it open development.
> >
> > rik
>
> Yes, it does when the public doesn't have direct access to the
> development work going on.  Thats what started this thread in the
> first place.

This is ludicrous. You don't have access to my private source trees on 
my private machines where I test and develop software before committing 
it to CVS. How does that change the fact that when I commit that 
software it has a standard two clause BSD open source license. 

Its the results that are open source, not the pre-commit experiments. 
Next you will be demanding that everyone writes every single thought 
they have about FreeBSD into some interminable web log so that the 
project can be truly 'open source'.