From owner-freebsd-current Fri Oct 4 13:34:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E7B37B406 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 13:34:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75AF43E3B for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 13:34:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g94KYMpS078793; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 22:34:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Stefan Farfeleder Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Junior Kernel Hacker page updated... In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 04 Oct 2002 15:41:41 +0200." <20021004134141.GA263@frog.fafoe> Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 22:34:22 +0200 Message-ID: <78792.1033763662@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20021004134141.GA263@frog.fafoe>, Stefan Farfeleder writes: > I have committed your patch, but left it #undef'ed until we get the kernel straightened out. On behalf of the FreeBSD project I have to warn you that if you persist in doing work of this kind over and over again, you will eventually be subjected to a commit bit. You have been warned :-) Thank you very much for you work! :-) Poul-Henning >The #ifdefs are already in the code, namely REMOTE and RMT_WILL_WATCH. >Is anybody using them? Building with -DREMOTE doesn't compile and with >-DRMT_WILL_WATCH the linker is complaining about the lack of the >functions Rmt_Ignore(), Rmt_Watch() and Rmt_Wait(). Can't we get rid of >those defines? I understand Juli Mallett wants to rewrite make, so maybe >this effort would be wasted. I belive the RMT/REMOTE stuff is part of an earlier attempt at putting in some kind of cluster functionality. If it is useful in any capacity, even as hint of what/how to do such a thing, I think we should leave it. If it is just old junk we should boot it. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message