Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 21:02:50 +0100 From: Matthew Rezny <rezny@freebsd.org> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> Cc: jharris@widomaker.com, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r434630 - in head/www/lynx: . files Message-ID: <1724035.JGxz2HHYse@workstation.reztek> In-Reply-To: <3AA22105-0A55-4761-95F3-CDAD27157F93@adamw.org> References: <201702221902.v1MJ2pks021893@repo.freebsd.org> <3AA22105-0A55-4761-95F3-CDAD27157F93@adamw.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 22 February 2017 12:19:53 Adam Weinberger wrote: > > On 22 Feb, 2017, at 12:02, Matthew Rezny <rezny@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > Author: rezny > > Date: Wed Feb 22 19:02:51 2017 > > New Revision: 434630 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/434630 > > > > Log: > > Fix building with libressl-devel and add missing dependency on libidn. > > > > PR: 216785 > > Approved by: jharris@widomaker.com (maintainer), swills (mentor) > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9672 > > > > Added: > > head/www/lynx/files/patch-WWW_Library_Implementation_HTTP.c (contents, > > props changed)> > > Modified: > > head/www/lynx/Makefile > > > > Modified: head/www/lynx/Makefile > > ========================================================================== > > ==== --- head/www/lynx/Makefile Wed Feb 22 18:56:44 2017 (r434629) > > +++ head/www/lynx/Makefile Wed Feb 22 19:02:51 2017 (r434630) > > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ > > > > PORTNAME= lynx > > PORTVERSION= 2.8.8.2 > > -PORTREVISION= 5 > > +PORTREVISION= 6 > > PORTEPOCH= 1 > > CATEGORIES= www ipv6 > > MASTER_SITES= http://invisible-mirror.net/archives/lynx/tarballs/ \ > > @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ COMMENT= Non-graphical, text-based World > > > > LICENSE= GPLv2 > > > > +LIB_DEPENDS= libidn.so:dns/libidn > > Does libidn really need to be mandatory? lynx-current has it as an option. > Does lynx-2.8 handle idn differently? > > # Adam The addition of libidn was in response to stage-qa's notification while testing the patch for LibreSSL. I did not investigate the possibility of an option, though it does appear one could easily be added.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1724035.JGxz2HHYse>