From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug 28 12:32:52 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C76CF16A4BF; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4580643FDF; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from peter@wemm.org)
Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 314E92A8D4; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from peter@wemm.org)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: <20030828191408.65D172A7EA@canning.wemm.org> 
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:32:52 -0700
From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
Message-Id: <20030828193252.314E92A8D4@canning.wemm.org>
cc: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@tcoip.com.br>
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/bsdlabel bsdlabel.c 
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 19:32:52 -0000

Peter Wemm wrote:
> Peter Wemm wrote:
> > "Poul-Henning Kamp" wrote:
> > > In message <200308280815.12638.wes@softweyr.com>, Wes Peters writes:
> > > 
> > > >If I understand this correctly, this is a nice little change.  You're 
> > > >trying to discourage people from just using the 'c' partition *as a 
> > > >filesystem*, right?  
> > > 
> > > yes.
> > 
> > I'd like to see this go further and have the magic 'c' partition go away.
> > eg: instead of using ad0c or ad0s1c, use ad0 or ad0s1 as the 'whole
> > partition'.    Having ad0c and ad0 as pseudo aliases for each other is a
> > waste of a disklabel partition IMHO.
> 
> Before this turns into another 'thread from hell', let me clarify that.

Oh crap. I forgot about the f*cked up braindamage in the bootblocks
about this.  Sigh.

Cheers,
-Peter
--
Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5