From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 14:20:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5377516A4B3 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:20:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D209B43FE1 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:20:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8GLKBUp029095 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:20:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h8GLKB7M029094; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:20:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:20:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200309162120.h8GLKB7M029094@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Josef El-Rayes Subject: Re: docs/56902: [patch] articles/fbsd-from-scratch: add/fix sgml tags X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Josef El-Rayes List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:20:12 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/56902; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Josef El-Rayes To: "Simon L. Nielsen" Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/56902: [patch] articles/fbsd-from-scratch: add/fix sgml tags Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 23:14:53 +0200 "Simon L. Nielsen" wrote: > On 2003.09.15 22:35:55 +0200, Josef El-Rayes wrote: > > > --- article.sgml.orig Mon Sep 15 18:39:23 2003 > > +++ article.sgml Mon Sep 15 18:50:50 2003 > > @@ -396,9 +396,9 @@ > > > > Other areas are prepared for configuration, but will not work > > until stage two is completed. For example we have copied files to > > - configure printing and X11. Printing however is likely to need > > + configure printing and X11. Printing however is likely to need > > I don't think X11 should be marked up as application, since it is not > really an application, but rather the protocol/framework. Have you > found any other places where it's marked up with the application tag? for me it was in this association talking about X11 as an association, but i looked at the handbook chapter about X and only XFree86 was marked up as application so you are right here. shall i redo this patch and pr 56903 to leave X11 with markup? -josef -- www: http://www.daemon.li nic-hdl: JER1080312-NICAT BSD in AT: www.bsdcode.at "Make World - Not War!"