From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 09:47:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57428AA8FA8 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:47:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com (mail-wm0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E52791EE2 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:47:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id c200so104142070wme.0 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 01:47:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=pja3Vx1IS7OXevHrX1SBX+2y4RiJf+COSoAJ4KqKxQY=; b=bFAEPDw+d3Fvx8eH3n+r+RxG5Pgx1F/w1plRW6oDH3vTi25yDxUrhD8i7vlQMijHkD 5mNpDHs0Vz59kJ9O0yhcxmRFNP0b8pGxSXeHEgwzfPjHDb371eD0m273pPNP1Hr8JGxO H4eleDOCWNcij0X2aGvM1lZRQdhQhphAHkA3glWu0HXHVj7Bc9UEMcODhHCVQVM2eJy0 AsbGvSSKKKRn8AFPuDnmLDic/VGiEBFkj4iZlOLF7uzsN3ZD05FCFdOEImSctsSD0h56 WYy5KE0inrtAky0BWTr4XMVThDO3FJEL+9Jj4WtMC6+sFaAXIuVzOtrBH04KR9wjxerh oreQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=pja3Vx1IS7OXevHrX1SBX+2y4RiJf+COSoAJ4KqKxQY=; b=DYWwMg7ysAng+fwPdfi3qIPzl3AU3k1m4HEbNKTFu5oJ8CBiylB1sav7BDa1fNYOUC Z2g4QKaCuDF/waYvNjlJcfroPscHkSD2rt9t7Zzn7m2dyNDASNuVSe3v7rrA0L0Uk1K8 gkJsY5CAClIPQGifTEcZmc37+HIfZHwmp/gf2uz9yb9WCrynKiRSBMQ5TciQFShjGpSa GRTxCZB3DMpxylbyDXHFWIjlHwnTU0FwbCQME/A+fCPQ0BJRIqkhjMMCjYrdRSD5Co0m sY0j8nC9GjFi1iYQ8MYYXQZQL4837RvWVnIIa23cmMc0tYBF20A2CIYXtSK/rDXi9yuL 27fw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSHAy5JLZZfvvSxWHwTE4SiRj9hogv1qCBd4RerDYFRfZhFfpjzXu7g4/0RigDOtf7j0nq/3ox2qshHSg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.30.198 with SMTP id e189mr11059168wme.60.1455529640433; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 01:47:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.28.89.129 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 01:47:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201602150924.u1F9OIgB046904@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <201602150924.u1F9OIgB046904@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 12:47:20 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: net-im/skype4 under FreeBSD 10.3 From: Pavel Timofeev To: mexas@bris.ac.uk Cc: freebsd-stable stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:47:22 -0000 But isn't 'CentOS 6.7' is already in ports tree? 2016-02-15 12:24 GMT+03:00 Anton Shterenlikht : >>Has anybody tried net-im/skype4 under FreeBSD 10.3(-BETA[0-9])?? >>Seems like net-im/skype4 missing some dependencies and if it's >>satisfied net-im/skype4 hangs after start. >>linprocfs mounting doesn't help. >>I installed them all from the ports tree. >>Any experience? > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202780 > > Anton