From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Sep 30 20:01:15 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA20252
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 20:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA20228
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 20:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from siva (siva.captech.com [207.33.153.2])
          by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with SMTP id TAA22826
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 19:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from siva.captech.com by siva (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id TAA26710; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 19:31:29 -0700
Message-Id: <199610010231.TAA26710@siva>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
cc: "Kevin P. Neal" <kpneal@pobox.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.org, tech@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: VPS mailing list, BSD interest? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 30 Sep 1996 21:41:03 +0200."
             <9166.844112463@critter.tfs.com> 
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 19:31:29 -0700
From: James Graham <greywolf@siva.captech.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Poul-Henning Kamp sez:
# 
# Yes we want this.
# 
# >What, aside from extendable partitions, would LVM give us over CCD?
# 
# Architecture instead of hacks.

Methinks I detect a hint of elitism in that statement.