From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Aug 31 09:41:28 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id JAA12705
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 31 Aug 1995 09:41:28 -0700
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA12695
          ; Thu, 31 Aug 1995 09:41:24 -0700
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id JAA22861; Thu, 31 Aug 1995 09:38:34 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199508311638.JAA22861@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: What do you think of these patches to echo?
To: sos@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 1995 09:38:34 -0700 (MST)
Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199508310628.XAA25550@freefall.FreeBSD.org> from "sos@freebsd.org" at Aug 30, 95 11:28:40 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 605       
Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> > Disclaimer:
> > 	I don't propose that we change all the commands to be SCO
> > 	compliant (heavens!) by any stretch, simply that the change to
> > 	this one is innocuous enough that we get good "bang for the
> > 	buck" in increasing the quality of our iBCS2 coverage from one
> > 	very small change.
> 
> Ahem, next time it will be easier yet, then we have presedence :)

Alright!  An enabler of change!

It's not strictly POSIX non-conformant, it should go in.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.