From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 22 11:03:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85DCEB3B for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 11:03:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm43-vm5.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm43-vm5.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [67.195.87.220]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42E06E33 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 11:03:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.fr; s=s2048; t=1424602639; bh=DwZG9xOw1EHBiSpPBTv6nkEVHMLafbebgxdOQwtuvvE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=PQaDkq3GJZs6YaEE9Qe9ijWCDZJn1Jxtu63FJ4yDE2hlBPfYSQNSsgbYfhSgkF65ijCunOWZZN4bXLzkJxbMpy2kYLc7Q3NUTfJKjhNahgeELa+JB+CXcl9idBcxdH/IhUhpwcz32YMDmWa0M1K6TaXGUWZTllQuP0xGbgYebN56vP6JgGdtOqPkXhrmRMGGPgsX3QvVgWqVzx+bFU6OF9qYN37dwAMGfexb5L45sRmbOiqieg/JarCEkH2FEhXJ+6P3GMTRk9Mi1Ba9MaUIWCkVJJtId4lrnsi5XY7/MMqwrplVRoKN/QPP2TXf7kKkiNh5+OVBFulphzchHGm4kw== Received: from [127.0.0.1] by nm43.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Feb 2015 10:57:19 -0000 Received: from [98.137.12.189] by nm43.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Feb 2015 10:54:19 -0000 Received: from [98.137.12.210] by tm10.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Feb 2015 10:54:19 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1018.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Feb 2015 10:54:19 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-4 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 634747.26078.bm@omp1018.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: SQqg3MIVM1lAqvZKYe9QevgJDqWDYLdq6HgkabkR8zXplu8SxGrSQku4nSr1wrG omClybkilZ.UdZgbPtOsNZGlVIr1oLMz7umqVEZBY2F8qGxHD2BduZcgd1YctnyvxWUjeEpa6s1p CgIjV02gkIQN1Gt7shAH4TFHIFHwbbl606taWfHvCDyqL1PqSel7TBRbChzvfRIyn9aZr2GK9UPN wUmKlusYMqL65SsVHO6klVJc5SxlNqxLIMRW6UlQEsDoRVFDtDTNf_0I5nrNYT.zghsMMp7EqQ5Z gsT.5JzMKGjtwjjcnKF.w0XT2Eb2ALuLAcNw2ckFkI0CNTmGWmUv7qCtB6P0ihYvZa3dIpobiz25 eV8iDH2oBArRhFffNuw3gXJbsisRFlU48_zHGxGXJyO2MUaWaFcvTa.tUbZQlQ7zShU_pxwB22sp Xv1kcYin3160cF6Ao7AfZv7i.kMl8L0fyD95TZrsctCE.jVdgM1FHAIhwZqmd2RMUH_5StgucuKg w7sZNBt.GwJ3OYQhjAfO2SVlyAsFNnTp0J24AgoNjE2g9N897AdqDAi3I8I43230eHsSWSwEwFkh f4kg6gFkWIOEEgpI8OJmeLGMvHOtlqIbbAxF1LXHoTCWU37elKmX9maZqflqLBduzttxYKOgz0XK gz_Vzj9C1tPMV_uHSdedTBw9G0fsed10tc7.sde4Fzpe40CDshSF8YRbPBGcewEEt5qyRj597ksT GHUlU72RHTjs2HUNPNEjZsiHcTxiOp3bLs0zDrzidchQCreFd34UhiDbh61mPzYcvz2ZSHYAjI65 IzUY- Received: by 217.12.9.14; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 10:54:17 +0000 Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 10:54:17 +0000 (UTC) From: dervishe Reply-To: dervishe To: "freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org" Message-ID: <1227462529.6746581.1424602457182.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20150220221246.661f2d01@shibato> References: <20150220221246.661f2d01@shibato> Subject: Re: [Call for testers] DRM device-independent code update to Linux 3.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 11:03:02 -0000 Thanks for your work :)I apply the h version of the patch on r279140 and it= failed on some hunk (Same result as J.R Oldroyd)I will try to apply the pa= tch manually and give you the resultsMy chip is Intel Corei7 4th gen (Haswe= ll) K G+ : https://plus.google.com/u/0/+AlexandreKeledjian/posts Twitter: @dervyshe Blog: https://blogs.fsfe.org/dervishe/ Public key: https://keybase.io/dervishe/key.asc GitHub:=C2=A0https://github= .com/dervishe-/=20 Le Samedi 21 f=C3=A9vrier 2015 4h33, J.R. Oldroyd a = =C3=A9crit : =20 On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:49:44 +0100 Anders Bolt-Evensen wrote: >>=20 > I saw that you had updated your patchfile to drm-update-38.h.patch, and= =20 > ... > applied the patch, it seemed to be more successful, but on 22 occations= =20 > the patch still fails (the following list contains all the fails; the=20 > entire output can be seen here:=20 >=20 > Hunk #2 failed at 29. > 1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/drm2/drm_agpsupport.c.= rej > Hunk #2 failed at 31. > 1 out of 4 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/drm2/drm_auth.c.rej > Hunk #2 failed at 31. > 1 out of 26 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/drm2/drm_bufs.c.rej > Hunk #2 failed at 31. > 1 out of 17 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/drm2/drm_context.c.re= j > Hunk #1 failed at 21. > 1 out of 39 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/drm2/drm_crtc.h.rej > Hunk #2 failed at 31. > 1 out of 5 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/drm2/drm_dma.c.rej > Hunk #1 failed at 0. > 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/drm2/drm_drawable.c.re= j > Hunk #2 failed at 44. > 1 out of 8 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/drm2/drm_drv.c.rej > Hunk #1 failed at 19. > 1 out of 5 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/drm2/drm_edid.h.rej > Hunk #1 failed at 21. > 1 out of 17 hunks failed--saving rejects to=20 > sys/dev/drm2/drm_edid_modes.h.rej > Hunk #1 failed at 26. > 1 out of 7 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/drm2/drm_fb_helper.h.r= ej > Hunk #2 failed at 32. > 1 out of 9 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/drm2/drm_fops.c.rej > Hunk #1 failed at 19. > 1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/drm2/drm_fourcc.h.rej > Hunk #1 failed at 0. > 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/drm2/drm_internal.h.re= j > Hunk #2 failed at 31. > 1 out of 4 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/drm2/drm_ioctl.c.rej > Hunk #2 failed at 27. > 1 out of 50 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/drm2/drm_irq.c.rej > Hunk #2 failed at 31. > 1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/drm2/drm_lock.c.rej > Hunk #2 failed at 31. > 1 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/drm2/drm_memory.c.rej > Hunk #1 failed at 25. > 1 out of 10 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/drm2/drm_mm.h.rej > Hunk #1 failed at 22. > 1 out of 11 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/drm2/drm_mode.h.rej > Hunk #1 failed at 0. > 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/drm2/drm_sman.c.rej > Hunk #1 failed at 0. > 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/drm2/drm_sman.h.rej > _______________________________________________ Same errors here.=C2=A0 Applying patch to r279092 from svn master. Did you diff against the github source and is there perhaps some divergence between that and the svn master? I worked through the rejects and applied them manually. But, booting does not go well: Feb 20 21:58:22 xx kernel: panic: mtx_lock() of destroyed mutex @ /usr/src/= sys/modules/drm2/drm2/../../../dev/drm2/drm_irq.c:1036 Feb 20 21:58:22 xx kernel: cpuid =3D 0 Feb 20 21:58:22 xx kernel: KDB: stack backtrace: Feb 20 21:58:22 xx kernel: db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper= +0x2b/frame 0xfffffe00b2966600 Feb 20 21:58:22 xx kernel: vpanic() at vpanic+0x189/frame 0xfffffe00b296668= 0 Feb 20 21:58:22 xx kernel: kassert_panic() at kassert_panic+0x132/frame 0xf= ffffe00b29666f0 Feb 20 21:58:22 xx kernel: __mtx_lock_flags() at __mtx_lock_flags+0x14a/fra= me 0xfffffe00b2966740 Feb 20 21:58:22 xx kernel: drm_vblank_post_modeset() at drm_vblank_post_mod= eset+0x3f/frame 0xfffffe00b2966770 Feb 20 21:58:22 xx kernel: atombios_crtc_dpms() at atombios_crtc_dpms+0x208= /frame 0xfffffe00b29667b0 Feb 20 21:58:22 xx kernel: atombios_crtc_commit() at atombios_crtc_commit+0= x14/frame 0xfffffe00b29667e0 Feb 20 21:58:22 xx kernel: drm_crtc_helper_set_mode() at drm_crtc_helper_se= t_mode+0x480/frame 0xfffffe00b2966a30 Feb 20 21:58:22 xx kernel: drm_crtc_helper_set_config() at drm_crtc_helper_= set_config+0x9c1/frame 0xfffffe00b2966b00 Feb 20 21:58:22 xx kernel: vt_restore_fbdev_mode() at vt_restore_fbdev_mode= +0x4e/frame 0xfffffe00b2966b20 Feb 20 21:58:22 xx kernel: taskqueue_run_locked() at taskqueue_run_locked+0= xf0/frame 0xfffffe00b2966b80 Feb 20 21:58:22 xx kernel: taskqueue_thread_loop() at taskqueue_thread_loop= +0x9b/frame 0xfffffe00b2966bb0 Feb 20 21:58:22 xx kernel: fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x84/frame 0xfffffe00b2= 966bf0 Feb 20 21:58:22 xx kernel: fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0xe/frame 0= xfffffe00b2966bf0 Feb 20 21:58:22 xx kernel: --- trap 0, rip =3D 0, rsp =3D 0xfffffe00b2966cb= 0, rbp =3D 0 --- Feb 20 21:58:22 xx kernel: Uptime: 37s Feb 20 21:58:22 xx kernel: Dumping 236 out of 2915 MB:..7%..14%..21%..34%..= 41%..55%..61%..75%..82%..95% Feb 20 21:58:22 xx kernel: Dump complete Feb 20 21:58:22 xx kernel: Automatic reboot in 15 seconds - press a key on = the console to abort Feb 20 21:58:22 xx kernel: Rebooting... I can also see earlier that the cp still did not init... same old CAFEDEAD in r100_cp_init. Chip is ATI Radeon RS690 X1270 IGP. =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 -jr _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 22 12:13:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F19F8BA for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 12:13:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jenkins-9.freebsd.org (jenkins-9.freebsd.org [8.8.178.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CEDC929 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 12:13:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jenkins-9.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jenkins-9.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3667A8A for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 12:13:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 12:13:16 +0000 (GMT) From: jenkins-admin@freebsd.org To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1600200767.31.1424607196115.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-9.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <1948528528.30.1424599553523.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-9.freebsd.org> References: <1948528528.30.1424599553523.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-9.freebsd.org> Subject: Jenkins build is back to stable : FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #744 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Jenkins-Job: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 X-Jenkins-Result: SUCCESS X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 12:13:17 -0000 See