From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Oct 17 22:39:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA10850 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Sat, 17 Oct 1998 22:39:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from velvet.sensation.net.au (serial0-velvet.Brunswick.sensation.net.au [203.20.114.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA10828 for ; Sat, 17 Oct 1998 22:39:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rowan@sensation.net.au) Received: from localhost (rowan@localhost) by velvet.sensation.net.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA25675 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 15:35:33 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from rowan@sensation.net.au) X-Authentication-Warning: velvet.sensation.net.au: rowan owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 18 Oct 1998 15:35:31 +1000 (EST) From: Rowan Crowe To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Multilink PPP daemon for FreeBSD - not mpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, 17 Oct 1998, Julian Elischer wrote: > mpd aint THAT bad.. > > anyhow, multilink has been added to user-land pp. > (at least in -current) should work in 2.2.7 as well The reason I'd prefer not to run mpd is that I don't like the configuration style and general operation of user level ppp. Thus, using multilink in user level ppp is pretty much the same (bad) thing. ;-) Maybe I'm just being stubborn, but my entire operation runs on pppd and I'd prefer to have something that's more similar to that... Cheers. -- Rowan Crowe Sensation Internet Services, Melbourne Aust fidonet: 3:635/728 +61-3-9388-9260 http://www.rowan.sensation.net.au/ http://www.sensation.net.au/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message