From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Apr 9 16:49:17 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from ewok.creative.net.au (ewok.creative.net.au [203.30.44.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B02515363 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 1999 16:49:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from adrian@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 14930 invoked by uid 1008); 9 Apr 1999 23:46:36 -0000 Message-ID: <19990409234636.14928.qmail@ewok.creative.net.au> From: adrian@freebsd.org To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATTENTION PLEASE: g77 in base system. In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 09 Apr 1999 11:28:52 EST." <19990409112852.A14614@symbion.srrc.usda.gov> Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 07:46:36 +0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Glenn Johnson writes: [snip] >hundred kilobytes. I would predict that with SGI's entry into the NT >market you will see more people looking at "Unix on Intel" to replace >their aging SGI Irix boxes. It would be a shame for them to choose >Linux over FreeBSD because Linux can compile their Fortran programs and >FreeBSD cannot. Personally I don't mind either way, however keep this in mind: Most linux systems are so package based anyway that "Linux can compile their Fortran programs and FreeBSD cannot" is equivalent to "you can't read the install documentation" . Hell, I'd be happy to have each type of compiler a tarball and install option there under 'compilers', with C/C++ standard. Then people really can't complain 'ahh but its a package, one package amongst too many..' Adrian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message