Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 11:06:21 -0700 From: Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> To: Sami Halabi <sodynet1@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Julian Stecklina <js@alien8.de> Subject: Re: Intel 10 GbE cards (ixgbe) Message-ID: <CAFOYbck2aJUA1gv1Rtnmm1u8Lze6O3nLYcNLe8t%2BNDr5muCzBQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAEW%2BogZb2T48L0GKfKqciXxt0o2CjxjpreGYDcqyHMBOKKoZ%2BQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201204251241.04752.zec@fer.hr> <87vckg84gk.fsf@alien8.de> <CAFOYbc=srg0GiMv=Gf79b9BbxHawEZpFrG=pXb5s2BUZqwCVTQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAEW%2BogZb2T48L0GKfKqciXxt0o2CjxjpreGYDcqyHMBOKKoZ%2BQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Funny, since I own the driver, one would think I'd know :) If you go look in the source directory for ixgbe you'll find a couple files in there: ixgbe_x540.[ch]. That should be a clue... Jack On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Sami Halabi <sodynet1@gmail.com> wrote: > x540has no fbsd driver > > Sami > > > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The 82599 is and has been officially supported for some time, the manual >> tends to lag, I will try and get it updated. In fact, given a choice I >> would always >> go with the 599. And yes, the X540 should be stable, its just not yet >> being >> used as much yet. >> >> Jack >> >> >> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Julian Stecklina <js@alien8.de> wrote: >> >> > Thus spake Marko Zec <zec@fer.hr>: >> > >> > > Hi all, >> > > >> > > Although the ixgbe driver appears to have code for both 82598 and >> 82599 >> > > chipsets, the manual page stil lists only 82598 based cards as >> officially >> > > supported. Does anybody have first-hand experiences with 82599 based >> > cards >> > > and recent versions of the ixgbe driver (-CURRENT, 9.0, 8.3)? >> > >> > We recently bought one: >> > >> > ix0@pci0:34:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0xa02c8086 chip=0x151c8086 >> > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 >> > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' >> > device = '82599EB 10 Gigabit TN Network Connection' >> > class = network >> > subclass = ethernet >> > ix1@pci0:34:0:1: class=0x020000 card=0xa02c8086 chip=0x151c8086 >> > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 >> > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' >> > device = '82599EB 10 Gigabit TN Network Connection' >> > class = network >> > subclass = ethernet >> > >> > It's currently used on 9.0 for benchmarking another box. Never had any >> > problems. Can someone say whether the X540 support in CURRENT is stable? >> > >> > Regards, Julian >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > > -- > Sami Halabi > Information Systems Engineer > NMS Projects Expert > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFOYbck2aJUA1gv1Rtnmm1u8Lze6O3nLYcNLe8t%2BNDr5muCzBQ>