From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Apr 20 05:00:07 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA17673 for isp-outgoing; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 05:00:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.webspan.net (mail.webspan.net [206.154.70.7]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA17664 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 05:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orion.webspan.net (orion.webspan.net [206.154.70.5]) by mail.webspan.net (WEBSPAN/970116) with ESMTP id HAA18681; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 07:57:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from orion.webspan.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.webspan.net (WEBSPN/970116) with ESMTP id HAA05505; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 07:57:11 -0400 (EDT) To: "Jay D. Nelson" cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Gary Palmer" Subject: Re: Liability (was: Binaries in Usenet (was: News...)) In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 19 Apr 1997 11:02:31 CDT." Date: Sun, 20 Apr 1997 07:57:11 -0400 Message-ID: <5503.861537431@orion.webspan.net> Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk "Jay D. Nelson" wrote in message ID : > Along with news, what about my encrypted mail. Is an ISP a potential > federal target if a user's encrypted mail is suspected of "terrorist" > communication? What is an ISP's liability if they filter out encrypted > mail? They can, and should, claim common carrier status. Just like the phone company is not liable if you send a code which triggers a bomb using a phone line. Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info