From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 6 21:06:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA2C1065674 for ; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:06:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0AE8FC19 for ; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:06:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id mA6L6F87028172; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 22:06:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id mA6L6Ftl028169; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 22:06:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 22:06:15 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Roland Smith In-Reply-To: <20081106172818.GA39709@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Message-ID: <20081106220335.Q28070@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <49131701.9020208@extracktor.com> <20081106172818.GA39709@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Foo JH , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what is your programming language on freebsd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 21:06:28 -0000 >> on FreeBSD is generally not a popular idea. > > As a re-implementation of microsofts .NET, I personally wouldn't touch > it with a ten foot pole. Although some parts are an ECMA "standard", as > a developer you can never be sure that microsoft won't hit you with a > patent lawsuit if they perceive you as treading on their > turf. Experience has taught the microsoft cannot be trusted. as all "portable" things microsoft created will actually work completely only in windows. anyway - i don't see any sense in using it if you are not forced to use windows. if you are - it would be better to use windows for that. >> 2. Is FreeBSD more optimised in performance for any particular language? > > No. Performance of scripting languages is usually not a big problem > anymore because of the increased speed of new computers. And it depends scripting language are not made to be fast running, but to "mix" many other programs to get result fast and easy. > more on the interpreter of the language in question than on the host > OS. Of course compiled languages can run faster than interpreted ones. as on every OS.