Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 00:25:58 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Dave Cornejo <dave@dogwood.com> Cc: freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: most stable release? Message-ID: <20060422042558.GA77422@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200604212025.k3LKPTWb027897@white.dogwood.com> References: <200604212025.k3LKPTWb027897@white.dogwood.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 10:25:29AM -1000, Dave Cornejo wrote: > I have an Ultra60 (w/dual 360) that was running CURRENT from October > 05, but was never really capable of taking heavy load without locking > up. I'm trying to get it fully usable again, but my impression of 7 > right now is that it has problems, and maybe 6 does too, so of the 3 > releases I can find (5.4, 6.1 RC, and 7 CURRENT) are any of them > really stable right now? 6.1 and 7.x are equivalent stability on sparc right now. In general 6.x is the way to go, of course. Kris --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFESbBWWry0BWjoQKURAsgsAJ4wSqIaWHF6m/XCr3wR4rwoRldhqgCfWkC4 cO06beTI44O0nRz5js8QT78= =fj4M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060422042558.GA77422>