From owner-freebsd-standards Thu Feb 27 13:27:32 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E6837B401; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:27:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8991843FA3; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:27:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from leimy2k@mac.com) Received: from woappsx42.mac.com (woappsx42-en1 [10.13.11.142]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id h1RLRQdD023855; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:27:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from woappsx42 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woappsx42.mac.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h1RLRNRZ019402; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:27:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5966486.1046381243011.JavaMail.leimy2k@mac.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:27:23 -0600 From: David Leimbach To: Mike Barcroft Subject: Re: default gcc conformance mode Cc: Tony Finch , standards@FreeBSD.ORG Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 11:24AM, Mike Barcroft wrote: >Tony Finch writes: >> Should the default conformance mode of gcc be C99+extensions rather >> than C89+extensions? This would make the -pedantic option more useful. > >I think some would argue against it, since we don't have a complete >C99 library yet. > I welcome the day when this is possible but I don't think we are ready yet. I agree with Mike. Dave Leimbach To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message