From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jul  8 16:37:51 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AE38316A4CE; Thu,  8 Jul 2004 16:37:51 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 94E0943D2F; Thu,  8 Jul 2004 16:37:51 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org)
Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192)
	id 7A7C85C846; Thu,  8 Jul 2004 09:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 09:37:51 -0700
From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20040708163751.GN95729@elvis.mu.org>
References: <20040707124751.GA66588@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040707124751.GA66588@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Sorting in top -m io
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:37:51 -0000

* Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> [040708 05:45] wrote:
> Hi all...
> 
> The new -m io option of top is cool, but sorting is broken when the 'io'
> mode is enabled.  The following patch adds sorting capabilities to the 'io'
> mode too and makes sure that hitting 'h' for help prints the right list of
> sorting keywords :)
> 
> The only thing I didn't add a sorting capability for is "percent", because
> I'm not sure I know all it takes to do this.
> 
> What do you all think of this patch to top(1)?

I think it's awesome.  Go for it.

-Alfred