From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Jan 27 6:52:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5732F15615 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 06:52:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #3) id 12DqHf-000JtT-00; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 14:52:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA49541; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 14:52:31 GMT (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 14:52:31 +0000 (GMT) From: Jonathon McKitrick To: Dann Lunsford Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sun release source code for Solaris 8 In-Reply-To: <20000127064713.A53522@greycat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Dann Lunsford wrote: >On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 01:02:23PM +0000, Jonathon McKitrick wrote: >> >> Interestingly, i noticed recently that the response time on usa.net >> seemed much slower. It appears consistently so, either by ppp >> connection or by network/T1 line. A few months ago, netcraft showed >> that they were running FreeBSD. Guess what they are running >> now? Yup... SOlaris. I dropped them a line saying i noticed the speed >> difference. > >Why do you think a lot of people call it Slowlaris? Another illustration: Funny you should say that.. that's exactly what i wrote in the feedback message...'What a shame to see you switch from FreeBSD to Slow-aris...' -=> jm <=- If a tree falls in the woods and no one is around, does anybody care? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message