From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Sep 25 23:19:37 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA11944 for stable-outgoing; Thu, 25 Sep 1997 23:19:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.uniserve.com (dns1-van.uniserve.com [204.244.163.48]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id XAA11939 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 1997 23:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shell.uniserve.com [204.244.210.252] by mail.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.70 #1) id 0xETkD-00073e-00; Thu, 25 Sep 1997 23:19:17 -0700 Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 23:19:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom To: Matt Behrens cc: Mike Burgett , "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: [Q] 2.2.5 bind release In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 25 Sep 1997, Matt Behrens wrote: > On Thu, 25 Sep 1997, Mike Burgett wrote: > > > Will 2.2.5 ship with the 4.9.6 or 8.1.1 BIND release? > > I'm 99.9% sure it'll be 4.9.6. 8.1.1 has the strongest nameserver but its > resolver library is sorely lacking and would probably cause many packages > to break. Has FreeBSD ever use the BIND resolver library? It seems to me that the FreeBSD resolver is whole mix of different things, and is not 4.9.6 either. Besides the BIND resolver is mainly for systems that come with such a useless/broken resolver that anything is better (ex SunOS 4.1). > Matt Behrens | matt@zigg.com > MST3K #85995 | http://www.zigg.com/ > > Tom