From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 15 12:51:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5F51065694 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:51:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8A48FC16 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:51:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A23BA46B06; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 07:51:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.10]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1EDE8A01D; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 07:51:46 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 07:41:35 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/7.4-CBSD-20110107; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201102150741.35265.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Tue, 15 Feb 2011 07:51:46 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.3 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=4.2 tests=BAYES_00,MAY_BE_FORGED, RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: Garrett Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix impossible case with waitpid(2) in truss X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:51:48 -0000 On Monday, February 14, 2011 11:12:02 pm Garrett Cooper wrote: > Hi, > waitpid(2) returns a value in the set { -1, 0, } (-1 in the > event of an ERROR, 0 when WNOHANG is specified, when the process > exits according to wait(2)); it never returns a value < -1. > If someone could commit this patch it would be appreciated. > Thanks, > -Garrett I went with '< 0' to match the style used for ptrace() invocations in other parts of truss. All four calls to waitpid() in truss were broken in this fashion. -- John Baldwin