From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 22:52:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E98106564A; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 22:52:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A208FC16; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 22:52:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047F9632F; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 22:52:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B3438816B; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 23:52:06 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Adrian Chadd References: <86ty4a8mc3.fsf@ds4.des.no> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:52:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Adrian Chadd's message of "Fri, 6 Jan 2012 13:30:31 -0800") Message-ID: <86ehv8xze1.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it possible to make subr_acl_nfs4 and subr_acl_posix1e disabled? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 22:52:08 -0000 Adrian Chadd writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav writes: > > I would be very annoyed if it were no longer possible to netboot > > GENERIC... > I don't want to break that. :) I Just don't want to compile it in > unless I'm using NFS/ZFS, and on my 4MB flash boards I'm not booting > w/ NFS compiled in statically.. Sorry, I just realized that I read the text of your message but not the subject; I thought you were proposing to remove NFS from GENERIC. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no