From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 11 16:42:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E736016A4D1 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:42:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from www.cray1.de (i.would.like.to.spoof.my.realip.de [64.27.85.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE5843D2F for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:42:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ubm@u-boot-man.de) Received: from greatsheep.marines (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.cray1.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id BAA21147 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 01:42:25 +0100 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 01:45:49 +0100 From: Marc "UBM" Bocklet To: current@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040312014549.2e4ecfb3.ubm@u-boot-man.de> In-Reply-To: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED802E867FD@bragi.housing.ufl.edu> References: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED802E867FD@bragi.housing.ufl.edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: I like SCHED_4BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:42:35 -0000 On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:32:35 -0500 "Will Saxon" wrote: > > I couldn't agree more. After doing the suggested mappings in > > libmap.conf > > and recompiling apps I can see a drastic difference in load times > > and performance between ULE and 4BSD. Using ULE the load wait for > > firefox could be anywhere from 10-30 seconds while with 4BSD it is a > > constant 4 > > second load time. When switching between desktops it can take > > up to 10 > > seconds to redraw the screen. This sluggishness isn't exclusive to > > firefox, opera and openoffice are noticeably laggy under ULE > > as well. I > > WANT to like and use ULE but the performance just isn't there. > > I am not experiencing this with firefox. It takes 2-3 seconds to load. > I am also not experiencing issues with screen redraws. Same here, using 5.2.1-RELEASE on a dual 450Mhz P2-Xeon. Firebird takes about 10 seconds to load and I have no issues with screen redraws even though I'm using a xinerama configuration with two PCI cards. Bye Marc