Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 14:10:14 -0500 From: Alan Eldridge <alane@geeksrus.net> To: Joe Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: dwcjr@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD Ports List <ports@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: CUPS support can be unconditional Message-ID: <20020111191014.GA45037@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> In-Reply-To: <20020111134107.J80091-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <20020111182721.GA42417@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> <20020111134107.J80091-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:42:33PM -0500, Joe Clarke wrote: > > >On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Alan Eldridge wrote: > >> I would recommend, upon some reflection, doing this the way we did in >> kdelibs. That is, cups-base is unconditional. If somebody really >> wants to use cups, they can't rely on another port to suck it in via >> dependency anyway; it doesn't work without being configured. > >I don't understand why your making CUPS mandatory for Samba. Some users >won't want it period. They'll want to stick with BSD printing (like for >use with apsfilter). This will cause unnecessary download and build time. > So Cups users should instead be required to build from source rather than use packages? A user who installs both samba and cups from packages (for example, when installing a new system from CDROM) finds that it won't work? That is a rather gross violation of POLA. -- Alan Eldridge Pmmfmffmmfmp mmmpppppffmpmfpmpppff PmpMpmMpp ppfppp MpfpffmppmppMmpFmmMpm mfpmmmmmfpmpmpppff. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020111191014.GA45037>