From owner-freebsd-multimedia Sat Feb 13 13:15:44 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA18184 for freebsd-multimedia-outgoing; Sat, 13 Feb 1999 13:15:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rip.psg.com (rip.psg.com [147.28.0.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA18173 for ; Sat, 13 Feb 1999 13:15:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from randy@psg.com) Received: from localhost (727 bytes) by rip.psg.com via sendmail with P:stdio/R:inet_resolve/T:smtp (sender: ) (ident using unix) id for ; Sat, 13 Feb 1999 13:15:41 -0800 (PST) (Smail-3.2.0.101 1997-Dec-17 #1 built 1998-Oct-13) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 13:15:41 -0800 (PST) From: Randy Bush MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Luigi Rizzo Cc: multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: good or bad idea ? (vat-related...) References: <199902131851.TAA26875@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Sender: owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > It's a dirty hack, ok. I think is useful, though, because many times > (e.g. during a lecture) what you really need are audio and slides, > not really a video of a dancing speaker. So, any objections to > having this in our vat port ? as one may vat in an environment where this might be felt to be unsafe, how about a runtime option to disable? randy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message