From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Jan 7 14:24:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from bryden.apana.org.au (bryden.apana.org.au [203.3.126.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F4637B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 14:23:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from roadrunner (roadrunner.apana.org.au [203.3.126.132]) by bryden.apana.org.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f07MNCo00471; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 08:23:34 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dougy@bryden.apana.org.au) Message-ID: <02ee01c078f9$ef722940$847e03cb@apana.org.au> From: "Doug Young" To: "Jonathan Chen" Cc: References: <20010108110951.C1239@itouchnz.itouch> Subject: Re: IPFW / 4.2 RELEASE Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 08:33:38 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thanks John What I'm trying to figure out are firstly the pro's & con's of compiling vs loadable module, & secondly how to use ipfw without natd (the LAN in this case uses public IP's) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan Chen" To: "Doug Young" Cc: Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 8:09 AM Subject: Re: IPFW / 4.2 RELEASE > On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:36:11AM +1000, Doug Young wrote: > > Is ipfw enabled by default in 4.2 RELEASE or is a kernel compile required > > in order to use it ?? > > Best to recompile kernel to enable it. Minimum options for ipfw+natd > are: > > options IPFIREWALL #firewall > options IPDIVERT #divert sockets > > -- > Jonathan Chen > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Experience is a hard teacher > because she gives the test first, the lesson afterwards > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message