From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Dec 7 18:13:12 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA15953 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 7 Dec 1997 18:13:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA15933 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 1997 18:13:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.7/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA12215; Sun, 7 Dec 1997 18:12:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 1997 18:12:42 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White Reply-To: Doug White To: Darren Reed cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2.2.5 upgrade. In-Reply-To: <199712080131.MAA05539@plum.cyber.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 8 Dec 1997, Darren Reed wrote: > > FYI, I just ran the 2.2.5 upgrade, and the most bizarre thing happened. > > When I rebooted afterwards, I had a 2.2.1 kernel. > > I suspect that a somewhat crowded / confused it, BUT, /kernel which > is dated today is 2.2.1, not 2.2.5. /kernel.GENERIC is 2.2.5. > > What happened ? Known bug; copy /kernel.GENERIC to /kernel and all will be OK. If you installed the kernel source for 2.2.5 simply rebuild & reinstall. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major