From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 18 19:50:25 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FD016A418 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:50:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tankko@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7A313C442 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:50:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tankko@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so331837waf for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:50:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=+Ld6RfDlalbDsMVzzVvutXbk6bGDcducQVKdWXRbWvc=; b=YT8+8JR6EdrGQ2OzgIkVKRijm2kzC3vd1KksOHvevKy+yUPlED51UbZaffhzhZCjXnENYtAIKui+wGOJP0AZYNzFmoZkwwmgSEHm6q0FzMcza7FAEz6/5D9uP19SB1Bzk2odEhBNQgxTY1rMsU5SiP4AzcmSB/Ru5ZQJQuxiP08= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=YTBXUtyRKNbZgHL8GieZVexY8ieT2tW7RQKPXAZJKFtX6rC9JTXDEK3YNJIniDd0JB7ZHk8gwCM3yMYmEBqXaytMw+yNT7BcjExgpPkwZLCXtSMJDmLVIN/cs5AuWATs33Wi/JfaJONTYFRsAfxka9Ue8E/RCGaR33kcW3Ym764= Received: by 10.114.152.17 with SMTP id z17mr1014685wad.1192735269351; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:21:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.108.14 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:21:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7fec743f0710181221w258eef04n8ad01bf1f42d9152@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:21:09 -0700 From: Tankko To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: db41, db42 and db43 are they all needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:50:25 -0000 After installing 6.2 and all the ports I use on a new machine, I have: apr-db42-1.2.8_2 db41-4.1.25_4 db42-4.2.52_5 and there is db43 out there as well, probably just waiting to be installed. db41-4.1.25_4 is used by: portupgrade-2.3.1,2 ruby18-bdb-0.6.2 db42-4.2.52_5 is used by: apr-db42-1.2.8_2 Which is required by subverson (I need BDB access in subversion). Do I need all these different version of db? I guess there is no huge downside to having them all installed, but it doesn't seem clean to my anal-retentive nature. Is there a make.conf flag that will just make them all use db42 (or db43)? Is that wise? Tankko