Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 06:47:10 -0600 From: "James R. Van Artsdalen" <james-freebsd-fs2@jrv.org> Cc: freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: ZFS and reordering drives Message-ID: <4B1BA7CE.2050506@jrv.org> In-Reply-To: <20091206122603.GD2339@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <20091205170400.GM73250@gremlin.foo.is> <8555674.871260033069220.JavaMail.root@zimbra> <20091205184112.GP73250@gremlin.foo.is> <5da0588e0912051052p25fb743ele098ed9cb9de8fa0@mail.gmail.com> <20091205190641.GQ73250@gremlin.foo.is> <20091205191526.GR73250@gremlin.foo.is> <CA100C20-5F93-4DCE-B576-474DAEC10747@multipart-mixed.com> <20091206122603.GD2339@garage.freebsd.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > but there was a small > bug, which I fixed yesterday, where guid wasn't checked if name matched. Thanks - that should explain what I and others have seen. If (A) there is a drive name match and a GUID is found on the dev but (B) the expected GUID from zpool.cache doesn't match what's on the dev but (C) another dev is found via GEOM that does have the right GUID: is the drive name updated, at least so that "zpool status" prints the actual dev names and not what was in zpool.cache?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B1BA7CE.2050506>