From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 06:03:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241F016A4CE for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 06:03:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DC843D1F for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 06:03:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro) Received: (qmail 9251 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2004 14:03:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro) (81.196.25.19) by mail.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 11 Feb 2004 14:03:31 -0000 Received: from it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro (localhost.buh.cameradicommercio.ro [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro (Postfix) with SMTP id C3DC3A2 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:05:17 +0200 (EET) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:05:17 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040211160517.5adcafa9@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: A little mail(1) and sylpheed-claws problem - standard ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:03:34 -0000 Hi, Could someone who know this better tell me if the ``Status:'' header mail(1) and nail(1) are adding are documented in some standard ? Sylpheed-claws chokes on this, not parsing the headers right. This is an example, the first being parsed ok and the second not (it's displayed as (No From) (No Subject) (No Data)). ------------------------------------------------------- >From itetcu Wed Feb 11 15:36:47 2004 >From itetcu@localhost Wed Feb 11 15:36:45 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itetcu Delivered-To: itetcu@localhost Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9D99C117; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:36:35 +0200 (EET) To: itetcu@localhost Subject: test2 Message-Id: <20040211133635.9D99C117@localhost> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:36:35 +0200 (EET) From: itetcu@localhost (Ion-Mihai Tetcu) X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.000000 X-DSPAM-Signature: 402a2fee22243737811597 test2 !DSPAM:402a2fee22243737811597! ------------------------------------------------------- >From itetcu Wed Feb 11 15:43:44 2004 Status: O From itetcu@localhost Wed Feb 11 15:43:44 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itetcu Delivered-To: itetcu@localhost Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B6FC0F0; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:43:43 +0200 (EET) To: itetcu@localhost Subject: test4 Message-Id: <20040211134343.B6FC0F0@localhost> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:43:43 +0200 (EET) From: itetcu@localhost (Ion-Mihai Tetcu) X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.000000 X-DSPAM-Signature: 402a319023603966492165 test 4 , !DSPAM:402a319023603966492165! ------------------------------------------------------- -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user