From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Jan 23 15:46:32 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54464CBEEEF for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 15:46:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@cschwarz.com) Received: from orion.uberspace.de (orion.uberspace.de [95.143.172.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACC431D3 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 15:46:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@cschwarz.com) Received: (qmail 13682 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2017 15:46:20 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO csarch.local) (127.0.0.1) by orion.uberspace.de with SMTP; 23 Jan 2017 15:46:20 -0000 Received: by csarch.local (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 933AC38C064; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 16:46:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 16:46:19 +0100 From: Christian Schwarz To: David Chisnall Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, mmacy@nextbsd.org Subject: libc++ missing in drm-next-4.7 [WAS: libstd++ missing in drm-next-4.7] Message-ID: <20170123154619.x55kh6ecfskvlcxd@csarch.localdomain> References: <20170120140645.67ei3nkd4mcaq3ec@csarch.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161126 (1.7.1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 15:46:32 -0000 On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:36:40AM +0000, David Chisnall wrote: > > clang39 # now run clang, won't work, see below Shared object > > "libc++.so.1" not found, required by "clang" > > For clarification, are you missing libc++ or libstdc++? libstdc++ > hasn’t been a default part of the base system since 10.0 for x86 > architectures. Please excuse my sloppiness in writing this message. Of course, I mean libc++, as seen in the clan39 / ld message. Changed the subject to reflect this. Thanks, Christian