From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 17:44:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC7216A400 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:44:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8E313C469 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:44:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from archangel.daleco.biz ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l3CHiXQI065435; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:44:35 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <461E6FFC.4070806@daleco.biz> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:44:28 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2pre) Gecko/20070221 SeaMonkey/1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sean Murphy References: <461E6C79.9070107@calarts.edu> In-Reply-To: <461E6C79.9070107@calarts.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shell PATH not being reread X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:44:38 -0000 Sean Murphy wrote: > I have just installed FreeBSD 6.2 Release. I su to root and run > > pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui > > It installed fine > > I edited the ports-supfile > cd /usr/share/examples/cvsup > vi ports-supfile > > but when I go to run > > cvsup -g -L 2 ports-supfile > > It tells me it cannot find the command FAQ, I think. For csh/tcsh, issue "rehash": # portinstall myfooport # myfooport myfooport: Command not found # rehash # myfooport --version Welcome to myfooport v0.0.0! If you are indeed having this problem with /bin/sh, I'm not at all sure why, as I think it rereads the executables in $PATH fairly continuously (but then, I hardly use it for interactive use). A brief test here didn't show evidence that this would be a problem for sh, though. HTH, Kevin Kinsey -- Nobody wants constructive criticism. It's all we can do to put up with constructive praise.