From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 27 20:31:35 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6A116A4B3 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 20:31:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.chesapeake.net (chesapeake.net [208.142.252.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D20C4403D for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 20:31:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from localhost (jroberson@localhost) by mail.chesapeake.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h8S3VPD13301; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 23:31:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 23:31:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Jeff Roberson To: Morten Rodal In-Reply-To: <20030927171727.GA68494@hauk10.idi.ntnu.no> Message-ID: <20030927233041.C99666-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Roderick van Domburg cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of SCHED_ULE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 03:31:36 -0000 On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 06:47:54PM +0200, Roderick van Domburg wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > I was wondering about the status of the ULE scheduler. Is it very > > experimental still or is it reasonably suitable for everyday (i.e. > > non-mission-critical) use? > > > > It has improved quite a bit lately, and is now also working with KSE. > However, the mouse will get sluggish whenever the computer is under > bursts of load (i.e. a compile) > > -- > Morten Rodal > I have not had this experience. Can you give me details of your machine and the kind of load that causes slugishness? I'll correct it as soon as I can identify it. Thanks, Jeff