From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb  6 18:32:56 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D318E20
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Fri,  6 Feb 2015 18:32:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54232A6A
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Fri,  6 Feb 2015 18:32:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t16IWusv031760
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 18:32:56 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 195426] mail/pine-pgp-filters Makefile contains incomplete
 check for ${LOCALBASE}/bin/gpg2
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 18:32:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-195426-13-dzXcnQSDYP@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-195426-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-195426-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 18:32:56 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195426

--- Comment #3 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> ---
I had to go look at the Makefile to understand what you meant (that was after
the second explanation).

So this is a huge hack.
This is going to install gnupg1 100% of the time as well on the builders.  The
if exists line will never be true (the expansion of LOCALBASE makes no
difference, it will always be false).

AFAICT, gnupg and gnupg1 can co-exist, so what's the point of trying to avoid a
single dependency anyway?

We should just pick the correct dependency (security/gnupg I presume) and
remove this hack.

thoughts?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.